Though The Thin Blue Line made a substantial amount of money, Morris declares he lost money from the production. You have to wonder why these people agreed to interview for the film, and place themselves at risk of being revealed as purgers. How much did Morris fork out to secure their testimonies? Adams' testimony, though it isn't evident in the film, is a last ditch effort to have his story told. He was serving a life sentence for a crime he had declared from the start he never committed. Following the account of some sketchy eye witnesses, and the psychiatric report of Dr Death (Dr James Grigson - a man who testified at more than 100 trials that resulted in death sentences), Adams is found guilty. This is despite the fact that most of the evidence suggested that Harris, who had stolen the car, possessed the murder weapon, and had the violent capabilities to commit such a heinous crime, was the likely killer.
While predominantly relayed through interviews, the cloudy mystery that slowly pieces itself together is intriguing and compelling, made even more so by the various reenactments of the crime. These are often from the perspective of the witness accounts, presented in a way that asks us to consider their accuracy. Phillip Glass' score is also wonderful. The Thin Blue Line is a real-life whodunit, and a film that breaks new ground in political filmmaking. Morris is a man whose ambition seems to sit somewhere between detective and documentarian. So compelled to present the truth to the mysteries that plague controversial, thought-provoking events, he goes to any length to find it. The results in The Thin Blue Line are nothing short of extraordinary. My next stop is his 2003 Oscar winner for Best Documentary, The Fog of War.
No comments:
Post a Comment