I first watched The Imposter at last year's Melbourne International Film Festival. This review first appeared in my diary coverage.
In 1994, a 13-year-old boy, Nicholas Barclay disappears from his rural hometown in San Antonio, Texas without a trace. Three and a half years later, his family is contacted with the news that Nicholas has turned up...in an orphanage in southern Spain. He has a story of kidnap, abuse and torture - at the hands of the military - and is evidently a very different person to the blue-eyed, blonde-haired youth who went missing. Not all is as it seems, and we soon learn that the boy welcomed home by Nicholas' overjoyed, yet completely oblivious family is not Nicholas Barclay at all, but Frederic Bourdin, a 23-year-old French man. The Imposter is a truly mind-blowing documentary which blends real-life testimony with sleekly photographed re-enactments. Despite hearing both sides of the tale, and we gather further insight from investigating parties and those involved with the reuniting of the family with their supposed son, we still leave feeling like we are no closer to complete authority on the truth behind this bizarre story.
In 1994, a 13-year-old boy, Nicholas Barclay disappears from his rural hometown in San Antonio, Texas without a trace. Three and a half years later, his family is contacted with the news that Nicholas has turned up...in an orphanage in southern Spain. He has a story of kidnap, abuse and torture - at the hands of the military - and is evidently a very different person to the blue-eyed, blonde-haired youth who went missing. Not all is as it seems, and we soon learn that the boy welcomed home by Nicholas' overjoyed, yet completely oblivious family is not Nicholas Barclay at all, but Frederic Bourdin, a 23-year-old French man. The Imposter is a truly mind-blowing documentary which blends real-life testimony with sleekly photographed re-enactments. Despite hearing both sides of the tale, and we gather further insight from investigating parties and those involved with the reuniting of the family with their supposed son, we still leave feeling like we are no closer to complete authority on the truth behind this bizarre story.
During my post-screening research I learned that there have been some hostile responses to The Imposter
with claims made that Bart Layton trivialised the boy's disappearance,
made a mockery of the family - who are either really dumb, are so
susceptible in their grief they will accept anyone into their home, or
are hiding some sinister secrets - and offered up very little new for
those already familiar with the story. I guess it does work better for
viewers who have no idea that this extraordinary series of events even
took place, but there are still some astounding revelations and dramatic
turns that should fool the initiated too. It is a story that is too
good to be true, and while this might seem like an obvious statement,
the accounts are so cloudy that we feel like we can no longer accept
what is perceived to be the truth. Manipulation is part of what makes
this such an engrossing study, and the fact that something like this has
taken place really is hard to process. Also, the way the film is
structured, edited and scored, it rivals some of the great whodunit
mysteries. It is bewildering, edge-of-your-seat entertainment.
What
is fantastic about this documentary is that from the opening minutes we
are introduced to Frederic Bourdin, and privileged to his recount of
how he prepared to steal Nicholas' identity and managed to convince his
family that he was their missing son, so the film never leaves the
identity of the boy a mystery to us. Nicholas disappeared and the boy
picked up by his family is not Nicholas. But, the mystery becomes so
much more twisted and we realise this is just the beginning. Frederic
is welcomed home - he bears a lot of the same traits and distinguishing
features, including purely by chance, a gap between his teeth - but he
has a strange accent and an oddly present five o'clock shadow.
FBI
Agents and PI's sensed there was something amiss, and because no DNA
test had been made before Nicholas left Spain, there was really no proof
of his identity, beyond the family's acceptance. They set about proving
his identity. But questions start to mount. If this isn't Nicholas,
then who is he? Why were the family so convinced that he was their
son/brother? What actually happened to Nicholas? Was his disappearance
linked to the family? There are twists you will never see coming, and
just imagining where this story could have gone, and how unfathomable
that would have been, is enough to provoke an endless series of
deliberations and discussions. Essential viewing.
My Rating: ★★★★★
It is a wonderful documentary. I too was a little worried about Layton's treatment of the family. I don't think it is something that you could easily get around, especially as they appear in the film.
ReplyDeleteI just love how taut the story is. It must have been a bitch to structure.